16 Jan FHL Materials: Philippine Claim to Sabah
This book explains the political, historical, and legal cases of the Philippine claim to Sabah, relying on government documents, press articles, and archival records. It also examines the different treaties signed by the sultans of Sulu and the Spanish government in 1836, 1851, and 1878, all of which help explain Sulu’s sovereignty over Sabah. It discusses the political and legal maneuverings of colonial powers like Spain, the US, and Britain over its Asian colonies for the sake of more land and power. The Appendices include three versions or translations of the deed of 1878, written in Malay in Arabic characters, indicating that the Sultan of Sulu has leased Sabah to businessmen Gustav von Overbeck and Alfred Dent. The book also has a map of North Borneo, published in 1933 and amended in 1962, with an inset of a map showing the Philippines, Indonesia, Thailand and Burma, and New Guinea.
(FHL’s copy was donated by the late former Senator and Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Raul S. Manglapus.)
The Philippine delegation to the talks was headed by VP Emmanuel Pelaez, Secretary of Foreign Affairs; and included Usec. Salvador P Lopez, Cong. Jovito Salonga, Sec. Macario Peralta, Jr., and Amb. Eduardo Quintero. The Earl of Home, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, headed the eleven-member British delegation. Among the questions discussed were “Political and Security Aspects,” which emphasized how the Philippine claim to North Borneo was being pursued in the interest of national security, specifically in the context of communist threat to Southeast Asia: “One of the great tragedies of this century, according to Lord Home, is that the process of decolonization should coincide with the Communist campaign to break up the capitalist world. The Communists are taking advantage of the spirit of nationalism in order to stir up trouble everywhere. This fact should be considered in connection with the Western bases in Southeast Asia” (p. 18). The report states that the British delegation found the Philippine claim “not well-founded.” At the end of the report is an evaluation of the talks by Amb. Leon Ma. Guerrero, which declares that the “outright recognition of the validity of our claim [is] next to impossible.”
This book contains an excerpt from President Diosdado Macapagal’s State of the Nation message to the Congress on January 23, 1963, explaining that the Philippine claim to Sabah was being pursued in the interest of national security: if Malaya (which would later be incorporated into the Federation of Malaysia) were to be a communist country, with North Borneo under its jurisdiction, “there would be created a situation in which a communist territory would be immediately at the southern frontier of the Philippines, which would pose a grave and intolerable threat to our country.” The book also includes the statement at the opening meeting of the British-Philippine talks in London in 1963. Between the second and third chapters is a foldable map of Southeast Asia showing “how essential North Borneo is to Philippine security,” North Borneo being only eighteen miles away from the nearest island of the Philippines. Chapter Three discusses the historical and legal bases of the claim; while the Appendices consist of thirteen historical documents as well as the different versions or translations, including Spanish, of the 1878 lease.
This booklet follows the question-and-answer form in explaining the basic aspects of the Philippine claim to Sabah from the seventeenth century until Ferdinand Marcos’ presidency. In the small, thirty-two-page book, the government declares that it will continue pursuing its claim “through pacific means, preferring a settlement by the International Court of Justice, since the issue is a justiciable question; it is a legal question.”
The booklet collects the following lectures delivered in the symposium organized by the National Historical Commission on the Sabah question: “English trade and politics in the Mindanao Sulu area: 1684-1888” by Serafin D Quiason; “The Sulu Sultanate and its original acquisition of Sabah” by Cesar Adib Majul; “The Philippine claim to Sabah: legal aspects” by Ethelwoldo E Fernandez; “Historical aspects of the Philippine claim to Sabah” by Armando D Manalo; and “The Sabah question: prospects and alternatives” by Rolando N Quintos.
This book analyzes the Sabah issue from a foreign perspective, working on the assumption that the pursuit of the claim to Sabah is simply the Filipinos’ attempt to demonstrate their independence to the world “to improve their national image.” Noble concentrates on the development of Philippine policy on Sabah based on national image, as well as on the British and Malaysians’ perceptions of this image. The book tackles the different policies on Sabah from 1962, when “pro-American” president Diosdado Macapagal rose to power, to the 1970s, when Ferdinand Marcos, in the country’s attempt to consolidate more with the ASEAN, backtracked and declared that he intended to drop the claim. The book discusses all the documents, incidents, and discussions relevant to the case from the nineteenth century until 1976, including the Bangkok talks and the so-called “Jabidah Massacre” of 1968.
From the book jacket: “This book…is concerned primarily with the making of British policy towards the Sulu-Sabah region. It is based largely on British documents, and throws light on British attitudes towards the other Europeans in the area, and towards the indigenous states of Southeast Asia, during the late eighteenth, nineteenth, and twentieth centuries. The book may also make a contribution to the study of the Malay sultanates and their reactions to the West… . Finally, the author offers some observations on the Philippines claim to Sabah and suggests some ways in which the problem might be resolved.” The book’s historical discussion of the Sulu-Sabah region stretches to as far back as the 1500s, when Spanish colonizers first arrived in the area.
This compilation of materials reflects how the issue of Sabah has remained a subject of national controversy in 1987. The compilation presents opposing views, such as Sen. Lorenzo Sumulong’s “A report on Malaysia and on the greater Malayan confederation in connection with the Philippine claim of sovereignty to a portion of North Borneo,” and Cong. Jovito Salonga’s reply to that report. It presents a comprehensive history of the Sulu sultanate by Santanina T. Rasul. The collection also includes selected documents relating to the Philippine claim to North Borneo, some of which have previously appeared in Philippine claim to North Borneo Vol 1. These documents include diplomatic correspondence between Filipino and British officials in 1962; statements and communiqués from the London talks of 1963; and the relevant historical documents such as contracts, letters, and agreements among colonizing and colonized officials.
Published to “commemorate the twenty-fifth anniversary of Sabah’s independence within Malaysia,” the book contains thirteen essays on Sabah’s political, social, and economic growth in the context of Malaysia’s history as a young, newly independent nation starting 1963. It covers the development of administrative, welfare, and medical services in Sabah; the building of houses, schools, museums, and libraries there; and the economic, cultural, and demographic landscape of the place. The Philippine claim to Sabah has not been mentioned anywhere in the book.
Among copies of maps in the library is that of A chart of the passages between the Philippines and the Isles of Borneo and Mindanao with those to the Southward of the Sooloo Archipelago and the Isle of Mindanao, by Robert Laurie & James Whittle, London, 1799 (SC00490 in Retrato). Another map showing the proximity of Sulu to Borneo is Third part of Asia, or part of China, the islands of Borneo and the Philippines, etc., 1700 (SC00257 in Retrato). FHL also has a copy of a topographic map of Borneo, circa 1600 (SC00271 in Retrato).
Photo: Third part of Asia, or part of China, the islands of Borneo and the Philippines, etc., 1700